In saying that, however, there are reasons to be hesitant about performance enhancing drugs going straight from the current approach to a laissez-faire system. Glorifying “natural” playing in sports only encourages more injuries and, thus, short careers.
- While PEDs may seem like the quick ticket to athletic glory, they are deadly.
- In saying that, however, there are reasons to be hesitant about going straight from the current approach to a laissez-faire system.
- So, should performance-enhancing drugs and technologies be allowed in sports?
- They can shorten not only an athlete’s career but their lifespan as well.
Pro 1: PED use is so prevalent that banning it only disadvantages those not doping and hinders the progress of sports.
“Some might argue that performance-enhancing drugs (PEDs) are cheating or unfair. I believe it would truly even the playing field because some countries (like Russia, which is currently banned from the Olympics until December 17, 2022 for their state-sponsored doping program) already are doping, while clean athletes are punished for being clean. There is a prisoners’ dilemma Drug rehabilitation for athletes, with the dominant strategy being to cheat.
Con Arguments
- We only have to look at bodybuilding, a sport that has historically encouraged PED use, for proof of this fact.
- There is a prisoners’ dilemma for athletes, with the dominant strategy being to cheat.
- While PEDs may seem like the quick ticket to athletic glory, they are deadly.
- They can shorten not only an athlete’s career but their lifespan as well.
We only have to look at bodybuilding, a sport that has historically encouraged PED use, for proof of this fact. Quite a few drugs, including steroids and growth hormone, that are regularly banned by sports organizations are useful medical treatments, especially for sports injury recovery. So, should performance-enhancing drugs and technologies be allowed in sports? “But everyone else is doing it” might not be an argument a teenager is going to win with a parent, but in the case of professional athletes and PEDs, the argument is one that the sporting world should accept. “Many of the PEDs which are currently banned ought to be allowed in the Olympics for athletes over 16 years of age. There is substantial justification for a less prohibitive approach to PEDs on the grounds of well-being, autonomy, and fairness; many of the objections to this proposal are simply unconvincing.
Pro 2: PEDs help athletes to recover from injuries and to endure the rigors of sports.
This penalizes those who have the moral character or fortitude to not cheat, while rewarding others who did cheat. Even https://ecosoberhouse.com/ if a PED is originally used for injury or surgery recovery, the drugs’ effects can be addictive and lead to more long-term use and unfair advantage in competition. While PEDs may seem like the quick ticket to athletic glory, they are deadly. They can shorten not only an athlete’s career but their lifespan as well.
Leave a Reply